-
Archives
- October 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: June 2006
Innovators Toolkit
A post from my public access blog “nipc invention” which may interest some of you is a seminar called the “Innovators Toolkit” which will take place at Lancaster University’s InfoLab21 on 3 August 2006 between 09:15 and 12:30. I am … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Trade Marks and Domain Names: Ellerman Investments Ltd v Vanci
This is an interesting example of how the courts can still be useful in a domain name dispute. The claimants included the Ritz Hotel, The Ritz Club, and the Ritz Club London Online. As one might imagine, they had registered … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Patents – Damages Inquiry: Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Eurocell Building Plastics Ltd
This is the latest episode in a marathon case that has already made a lot of interesting law. The claimant company, Ultraframe (UK) Ltd (“Ultraframe”)., designs and makes modular conservatory roofing systems. One of its products, the Ultralite 500, is … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Confidential Information – More Chinese Walls: Gus Consulting GmbH v Leboeuf Lamb Greene & Macrae
In Bolkiah v. KPMG [1998] UKHL 52, [1999] 2 AC 222, [1999] 1 All ER 517, [1999] 2 WLR 215 (16 Dec, 1998) the House of Lords considered for the first time some of the problems of confidentiality and conflict … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Trade Marks – Parallel Imports and Summary Judgment: Doncaster Pharmaceuticals v Bolton Pharmaceutical Co.
This case was about the exercise of the judicial discretion to grant summary judgment under CPR Part 24. One of the principal changes brought about by the replacement of the Orders of the Supreme Court by the Civil Procedure Rules … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment