-
Archives
- October 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: July 2010
Circ & Variete Globus Bucureşti v Uniunea Compozitorilor şi Muzicologilor din România – Asociaţia pentru Drepturi de Autor – U.C.M.R. – A.D.A.
I am on the IPO’s mailing list for news of preliminary references to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”). I tend not to mention them until they are reported but every so often a particular case catches … Continue reading
Interesting Slip: Leo Pharma v Sandoz
CPR 40.12 (1) provides: “The court may at any time correct an accidental slip or omission in a judgment or order.” It is known as the “slip rule”. It has a very venerable history. It replaces RSC O20 r.11 which … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure
Tagged Civil Procedure, CPR 40.12, Leo v Sandoz, slip rule
Leave a comment
Copyright: SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd.
Although SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd. [2010] EWHC 1829 (Ch) (23 July 2010) ended inconclusively (and some say disappointingly) with a preliminary reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union under art 267 of the Treaty … Continue reading